Especially for an idiot who claims to have "Invented" Global Warming and the Internet. This is a natural reoccuring earth cycle that Al Gore has tried to make us believe is something new to our Mother Earth. Other than Man's ever so slight contribution to warming, by way of burning oil, coal, gas, etc. do you believe Gore is worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize?|||Nothing whatsoever! This is clear evidence, however, that the committe considers global warming part of the greater environmentalists political ideology. When you check the record of the Nobel Peace Price committee and winners of the Peace Prize, you come to the conclusion that the committee and the Nobel Peace Price have very little merit. When people like socialist and pathological liar like Rigoberta Menchu, and Jimmy Carter, probably the worst U.S. president of the 20th century, are awarded the Nobel Peace Price, you know the Price is a joke, to say the least.
The committee cited the IPCC for its two decades of scientific reports that have "created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming. Thousands of scientists and officials from over 100 countries have collaborated to achieve greater certainty as to the scale of the warming."
However, the IPCC’s claim to have found the “human fingerprint” in the Modern Warming was bogus when Ben Santer first altered the science chapter in the IPCC’s 1996 report, and it remains bogus today. None of the 122 lead authors of the IPCC report, released in August 2001, ha the opportunity to place a stamp of approval on every statement. Though drafted by a small group of IPCC scientists, the brief account of the main points used by the media and called the Summary for Policymakers, was actually edited and approved by a political body.
Concerning Al Gore, we all know that he doesn't practice what he preaches.|||Well good thing uneducated hicks like you are not in a place to have any real say in this world. Leave science to the professionals, and stick to garbage disposal.|||The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded for bringing attention to it, and the strong (and growing) scientific evidence that global warming is directly influenced by humanity's actions, or don't you know how to read?|||Who cares?
The Nobel committees are a bunch of panty-waist liberals.
They want peace at all cost.|||no,
for he neither discovered or researched it
his film is not based on fact, rather speculation (see nat. geog.)
he is a self publisist
the whole issue is one that will only be really assessed via hindsight(in the future, a long time after we're all gone!)|||there are many reasons for climate change, but man and his suv's is not one of them. the earth's axial tilt and the wobble that it produces, her elliptical orbit, oceanic currents, plate tectonics, and solar activity all affect the climate on this planet and have since weather began here some 3.5 billion years ago. al gore is a leftist elite with an agenda and winning this prize and an oscar are part of that agenda. it's just that simple...|||Global Warming as it is hapening today is NOT a natural cycle. Yes, the earth does go through periods of warming and cooling, but the temperarures have curently risen at a rate that is not natural. This is directly related to CO2 emissions. The term global warming is used to refer to this unnatural rise in temperatures that is absolutely and completely caused by humans.|||Interesting...
I was wondering how the previous ice ages ended. Do you think it was because there was warming going on at a global level? I didn't even know SUVs were around back then.
Oh, I'm sure you'll get attacked for asking your question. And I'll get a few thumbs down. And don't forget the name-calling.
But seriously, pollution isn't a good thing. We can still question the causes of global warming and take care of our environment at the same time.|||Go and sit in the garage with the car running and discuss whether your death will be man made or natural.
The prize is because of the long term effect and lives saved as a result, air saved, agriculture saved and the bottom line is human as well as animal health.
Global warming isn't about just elevated temperature, the toxicity ratio in newborns today is 100% and they don't have an immune system. It is a fact that humans and animals are having reproductive problems.
This issue is at the forefront because of Gore and others stepping up, good for them. Your own families are toxic and Gore is trying to bring that forward, why beat him up over trying to save your life?
Any of you live in LA? You can't see the hills for the pollution and we are discussing if this is a natural cycle?|||As global warming progresses over the next few centuries, there will be war. To the extent that GW can be mitigated, lives will be saved---perhaps more lives than have ever before been saved by the actions of one person.|||So, you know better than the Nobel Peace Prize judges. Sure, it's a political prize, but so what. I imagine if being an idiot qualifies you for a Nobel, I would have expected Bush to be receiving his 6th or 7th by now.|||The only ones here doing the name-calling %26amp; engaged in character assassination adhominems are the anti-science, anti-change, anti-intellectuals among the answerers and the asker who started it all calling Gore, who just got a piece of the Noble Peace Prize, an "idiot". Troublemaking Q %26amp; the asker and lemming answers should all be RAMOeD %26amp; deleted.|||The scientific data clearly shows that the current change is not a natural one.
"I wasn’t convinced by a person or any interest group—it was the data that got me. I was utterly convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if we didn’t do something about this, we would be in deep trouble.”
Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.)
Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut and the first Commander of the Naval Space Command
Here are two summaries of the mountain of peer reviewed data that convinced Admiral Truly and the vast majority of the scientific community, short and long.
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Ima…
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.…
summarized at:
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf
Al Gore never claimed to have invented the Internet. The man who did invent it, Vin Cerf, has said that Gore's actual statements fairly represent Gore's contribution to developing the Internet into what it is today. Proof:
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.as…
Note that Gore shares the Nobel with the IPCC. Together they deserve it, the IPCC for proving that global warming is real, and Gore for making that known to the world.
Great website for real information about global warming:
http://profend.com/global-warming/|||Anyone that says nuclear power is green....does anyone else out there with a brain wonder why Al Gore proclaims to have the answer to his global warming scare mongering(namely nuclear power).Could it have anything to do with the fact he is supported by the nuclear power industry.Who is being swindled here? Who is going to make loads of money? No one with any sense can deny GW ,but it must be a first for someone to make so much money from a natural planetary cycle. As for Al getting the prize...well done. But please remember Mr A hitler was elected by the country of Germany because he convinced them he was right too. Getting a prize doesnt mean someone is right !!!|||it should bring all countrys together to work on a common enemy-the O.P.E.C. and how to stop trading with them|||"Invented the internet- get a clue! He never claimed to have invented it, and anyone with half a brain on here would know that by now. The rest of your dribble is just as thoughtless as the first comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment